In my opinion, I think Hamlet’s hesitation over killing
Claudius was necessary. I don’t think Hamlet treated the act as carefully as he
should of, but overall the smart
decision was to wait. Taking action would stay true to Hamlet’s purpose in
getting revenge, and prevent him from later killing Polonius, but the future
ramifications would be even worse.
I imagine that the consequences for Hamlet immediately taking
action involve either execution or exile. For example, in Shakespeare’s other
play, Romeo and Juliet , Romeo’s original punishment for killing Tibolt (Juliet’s
cousin) was going to be the death penalty. However, when the people learned
that Tibolt killed Mercutio (Romeo’s best friend) first and realized that Tibolt
would have been executed for committing this crime anyway, they amended Romeo’s
punishment to being banished. Both Romeo
and Hamlet hold a high social status in these plays, but only Romeo had proof
of his enemy committing murder first. If Hamlet was to kill the king with no
evidence of Claudius killing his brother, Hamlet’s punishment could be more or
just as (with extreme luck) dreadful. Also, because Hamlet appears to be going
crazy, his credibility is compromised.
It would be difficult for anyone to take his word that his father was
murdered by his uncle when he looks like he’s losing his mind. Since he seems
so affected by his mother and uncle’s marriage, people could also believe it
was just a ploy to get rid of Claudius in order to end their relationship.
Besides the potential cons to taking action, taking time has
a few advantages on Hamlet’s side. For instance, Hamlet’s idea about waiting
for when killing Claudius would put him outside of heaven wouldn’t have come if
he didn’t hesitate. Taking Claudius’
life wouldn’t have been revenge- Hamlet would have to wait for this moment in
order to truly inflict the pain on him that Claudius caused his father. Time
also gives Hamlet the opportunity to prove to people that Claudius had killed
his dad in order to replace him.
Although Hamlet mistakenly killed Polonius while he was “waiting for the
perfect time,” I believe the action was still done impulsively; given the circumstance,
Hamlet was probably full of adrenaline and anxiety. I think even more time was
needed in order for Hamlet to carry out his plan meticulously. Then, he would
be more focused and would have had no room for error.
I completely agree with you. I feel like you brought up good points that I didn't even think of myself. Like you said, him killing Claudius wouldn't have really been revenge. I like how you brought up Romeo and Juliet. It made me realize that in Shakespeare's plays, the consequence for things is usually always very extreme. If Hamlet killed Claudius right there, it would have caused more problems for himself.
ReplyDelete